The corrupt panel of three judges at the Court of Appeal turned a blind eye to clear evidence of fraud and fabrication of evidence by Victoria lawyer Greg Harney.
Experienced lawyers say the bill should have been between $10,000 and $25,000 so why did the bitches on the bench allow this Travesty of Justice to stand especially when there was evidence of criminal activity in the proceedings by the lawyer in order to advance his case.
The Editors believe that insiders with the Government of British Columbia blackmailed or threatened the three judges, Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson because that is the only plausible reason the judges would go against the law that clearly favoured Mr. English and his family companies and reject the new evidence that Mr. English had uncovered that proved that lawyer Greg Harney, or someone acting on his behalf, fabricated false evidence that he used to persuade the lower court judge, Master Peter Keighley, to grant a judgment against the English family for $220,000 in what was clearly a corrupt billing practice.
|Bitch Liz Bennett|
Click here to read blog dedicated to exposing corrupt Bitch / Judge Liz Bennett
|Bitch Mary Saunders|
|BITCH NICOLE GARSON|
Knowing that his initial bill was "an act of obvious insanity", Harney then sent a revised bill for $550,000 and commenced a lawsuit to collect the grossly inflated bill.
The initial hearing was before Master Peter Keighley who is suspected to be part of the Freemason criminal gang that operates inside the British Columbia court system.
Keighley first came to the editors attention due to his role in the destruction of British Columbia lawyer Karl Eisbrenner where Keighley presided over a Kangaroo court that relied upon a fraudulent psychiatric report craftily devised by a fraudulent psychiatrist to label Mr. Eisbrenner as delusional and disbar him because Eisbrenner was working on a law case that might have destroyed the career of yet to be elected BC Premier Gordon Campbell. Campbell.
Click here to read more about the case of Karl Eisbrenner.
Keighley should never have presided on the Harney v English case case because he is an employee of the BC Government, he is not a judge, and he had an indirect financial interest in the outcomebecause of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family a fact that did not become apparent to the English family until many months after the hearing but that Keighly knew about from the day he entered the courtroom.
EVIDENCE OF FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE (from the factum)