In the interests of fairness, the Editors are publishing Mr. Harney's request to remove the blog that reproduces certain allegations made by Jack English.However, the editors have declined the request because Mr. Harney, as an officer of the court, is a public official and the public have a right to know how its public officials are acting with the powers that the legislature confers upon them and their monopoly over the provision of legal services to the public.
The Editors recommend that the readers use discernment and make no comment upon the truth of accuracy of the allegations by either Mr. Harney or Mr. English.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Greg Harney <gharney@shieldsharney.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:13 AM
Subject: RE: Pending Story on Greg Harney
To: Joe Adam
cc: pacific rim, Paul Waller, shieldsharney.com
You
In spite of my earlier warning about your and Mr. English’s defamatory statements, the blog has reappeared, now with even more untruthful and false statements.
I have no idea where you get this stuff, such as staff allegedly walking out on me en masse, which has never happened, or the “fortress” office space, or the “gang rape”, but both you and Mr. English are inviting an action for serious damages for defamatory statements.
I worked on this case for longer than five months, and did not conspire or “gang stalk”.
Additionally, if I commence action, I will compel the production of the names and proof of the statements of the third parties such as the Victoria legal secretary and the Vancouver lawyer.
The content is insulting, and a deliberate attempt to sully my reputation.
If it does not come down immediately, and permanently, there will be consequences.
Greg Harney
