Registrar Outerbridge, Greg Harney, Justice Elizabeth Bennett, Cocaine Trafficking, Money laundering and the murder of Lindsay Buziak

Liz Bennett

The beautiful mess created by Victoria lawyer Greg Harney is now the subject of a major complaint sent to the Canadian Judicial Council and the RCMP filed by British Columbia lawyer John Frederick Carten who blew the whistle on major crime by insiders at the British Columbia Government in the water war crimes (by friends of Justice Elizabeth Bennett) and who has been assisting Jack English and his family attempt to recover their property that was stolen by British Columbia Government insiders using violence and other crimes that Elizabeth Bennett and her crooked gal pals on the bench, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson, are trying to cover up by their recent judgment.

Click here to Visit Water War Crimes WEB SITE

On June 29, 2016, Registrar Outerbridge made a landmark decision allowing Mr. English to file a rare "application for reconsideration" based on the fraudulent statements of the three justices contained in their judgment.  Mr. Harney and his lawyers, suspected to be the notorious Vancouver law firm of Nathanson Schachter and Thompson, are no doubt shocked at the ruling that may result in all their crafty and duplicitous work being undone. (Editors Note: Nathanson and Schachter refuse to respond to emails from our editors on the question of their role in this matter).

Mr. Harney and his lawyers are also no doubt doubly shocked to learn that their mischief has resulted in a rare complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council impugning the conduct of three Court of Appeal justices for engaging in the making of fraudulent statements in their judgment in order to cover up crimes by Government insiders.

But, there is more coming including Mr. Harney's alleged links to cocaine trafficking, money laundering and the criminal gang involved in the murder Victoria area real estate agent lawyer Lindsay Buziak which appears to be connected to a peculiar ruling made by the notorious Judge Liz Bennett.

Click here to read more about the corrupt practices of Justice Elizabeth Bennett

So, let's go back in time and remember that in 2007 Elizabeth Bennett, a former high level BC Government prosecutor, was selected, out of 100 possible other judges, to preside at a trial involving Mr.  Basi and Virk  and allegations of high level corruption in the Government of British Columbia related to the sale of BC Rail to a company headed by David MacLean, a friend of former Freeemason and convicted criminal Premier Gordon Campbell.  This information assists to explain why Elizabeth Bennett was selected to preside at English appeal on the Harney case that is also related to high level government corruption against the English family and their property and involved Freemasons and the Editors believe Judge Liz is controlled by the Freemason mafia in British Columbia that was, in part, involved in the attack against the English family.

For the record, Mr. Harney has denied he is a Freemason but he has not denied he fabricated evidence with intent to mislead the court, a matter Liz Bennett and her gal pals, Niki Garson and Mary Saunders, are covering up by their judgment.   

Judge Liz Bennett made a very bad decision in the Basi and Virk case that threatened the safety of a police informants both in the Basi and Virk case and throughout Canada.

The case was appealed to the British Columbia Court of Appeal where two Freemason judges, Lance Finch and Ian Donald, sided with Liz while Justice Cathy Ryan, presumably not a Freemason, dissented saying the informant should be protected from exposure.

The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada where all of the Judges of the Supreme Court sided with Justice Ryan and said Finch Donald and Bennett were wrong and the informer should be protected.  The case was so notorious that the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police applied to be intervenors and argued that the judgment by Liz was wrong and dangerous to public safety. So, based on her dirty decision in that case, we know what side of the law Elizabeth Bennett is on when it comes to protecting crooks in the Government.

Jason Lindsay and Greg

According to Jack English,  Harney is a good friend of Greg Martell in Victoria who's the Dominion Lending Mortgage Broker referred to the on the Buziak Murder Blog, who is in turn the best friend of Jason Zailo, Lindsay's high flying realtor boyfriend at the time of her murder, also referred to on the Buziak Murder Blog.

 

Jason is the one with the knife pointed at Lindsay's throat in the Buziak Murder Blog photo of him and Lindsay and Greg Martel before her murder on February 2, 2008, two months after crooked Justice Elizabeth Bennett made her ruling that put in jeopardy every police informant in Canada.  According to the blog, Lindsay Buziak had told her father that she had seen and heard some things she wished she had not seen or heard and ... well... we will let the readers connect the dots.... for now,... but,... the circle of corruption around Greg  Harney and Justice Elizabeth Bennett is getting tighter and tighter, like a noose around their necks, as each day passes and more information comes to our attention.

Editors Note: Let's be fair. The real criminal behind the attacks on the English family is the criminal cabal at British Columbia Investment Management Corporation which is the biggest  meanest junkyard dog in all of British Columbia controlling $150 billion in financial  assets and when BCIMC tells Greg Harney or Elizabewth Bennett and her gal pals on the bench to beat up Jack English and his family by fabricating evidence or making fraudulent statements in a judicial decision well,... they, Harney, Bennett, Garson and Saunders, well they have to obey or see their careers destroyed and that is exactly how the modern system of government works in British Columbia.  It is as illegal as hell but it is the new reality in British Columbia which explains why judges have twisted and bent the law to destroy Jack English and his family and why Greg Harney, an otherwise affable gentleman, acted like a pit bull and attempted to destroy his client by threatening him with a $1.2 million bill for a few days of time.  The Editors also advise that they have no direct evidence that Greg Harney is involved in cocaine trafficking or money laundering and that many lawyers are unwittingly drawn into the money laundering game.  

Is British Columbia Court of Appeal Registrar Tim Outebrdige Obstructing Justice?



Registrar Outerbridge

When Jack English read paragraph 44 of the judgment of "the three bitches on the bench" he knew either they had made a colossal error or they were taking instructions from insiders in the Government who were probably blackmailing or threatening all of them.

 

[44]        A review of the record shows that counsel for the appellants first raised the issue of proper identification of the clients on the bill with Mr. Harney before the Master’s hearing. Mr. Harney then re-filed the account naming all clients, and served the appellants with this amended document. The amended account was before the Master, as shown in his para. 1:

"This matter comes before me as an assessment of a solicitor’s account pursuant to ss. 70-73 of the Legal Professions Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 9. The bill in issue, dated October 11, 2011 and for $536,224.10, is directed to Pacific Rim Resort, a name used by the recipients of the account, John (Jack) English, Angleland Holdings Inc. and Nederland Holdings Inc. in connection with the ownership and management of properties on the West Coast of Vancouver island, near Tofino, British Columbia."

Click here to read the whole judgment

The sentence in paragraph 44

 "Mr. Harney then re-filed the account naming all clients, and served the appellants with this amended document".

is not true.

In fact, Mr. Harney never asserted that he served all of the appellants with his amended document and Mr. English swore an affidavit claiming that none of the defendants were served with the amended bill which was one of the grounds of the appeal because, if the amended bill was not properly served, the whole case has no foundation in law.

So, Jack English made immediate application to the court for the court requesting a "reconsideration" on the basis of a clear error of fact in the reasons for judgment.  This is not a common application but there is clear legal authority for such applications when the court misapprehends the facts.

Jack English prepared all the appropriate papers and went to the Court of Appeal registry in Victoria on Friday June 24, 2014 to file the papers and begin the process of seeking a reconsideration.  The Clerks at the Court of Appeal refused to accept the documents, they exhibited the classic body language of criminals and placed telephone calls to their superiors seeking instructions about how to block Mr. English from proceeding, finally, that whole matter was sent to Registrar Tim Outerbridge who must now decide, either to rubber stamp an obviously flawed decision and reject the documents, or give the documents to the `bitches on the bench` who will have to address and rectify their own colossal error and correct their judgment or admit that they are as corrupt as any court that ever existed on the planet.

The Editors and the public will be closely watching Tim Outerbridge to see if he is corrupt also because he is paid by the Government of British Columbia and his pension plan is invested with British Columbia Investment Management Corporation both of these entities have an interest in destroying Jack English and using the false Harney judgment to assist to bury Mr. English and his family property under a judgment obtained by fraud.

Editors Note The judgment of the "bitches on the bench' was released on June 17 which is the Satanic feast of Corpus Christi being the day upon which Satanists mock the memory and message of Jesus Christ. 

This release date makes perfect sense when one realizes that the judgment is based on a fraud and fabrication of evidence and one also knows that in British Columba there is a network of Satanist legal and judicial deviates who engage in human sacrifice, cannibalism, child sexual abuse and host of other crimes against humanity which is all proved by the documented excesses at Willie Pickton's Good Times Palace where politicians judges, lawyers, business people, drug dealers, police officers, and other gangsters gathered to watch our young women being slaughtered murdered and butchered on stage while they, the bastards in the audience, pumped white cocaine powder up their piggy noses all of which was covered up by former Attorney General Wally Oppal a Freemason who presided over the inquiry and made sure his Freemason brothers and sisters were protected from identification as all Freemasons must and the Freemason and former BC Premier Gordie Campbell continues to hide out in London England under the protection of Canada's dirty Queen Liz who many claim murdered her own daughter in law because she was pregnant by an Egyptian.   

THE BITCHES ON THE BENCH - Corrupt BC Court of Appeal Turns Blind Eye To Evidence of Crimes By Lawyer Greg Harney

GREG HARNEY

The "bitches on the bench" at the British Columbia Court of Appeal have soiled the reputation of the Court, again, by finding in favour of lawyer Greg Harney in his million dollar fee dispute fee  with the English family and their holding companies that he briefly represented when the Government of British Columbia and its agents used terrorism and other crimes to loot the English family property at fire sale prices after agents of the Government started the fires and used other criminal tactics to cheat the English family and steal their property.

The corrupt panel of three judges at the Court of  Appeal turned a blind eye to clear evidence of fraud and fabrication of evidence by Victoria lawyer Greg Harney.

Experienced lawyers say the bill should have been between $10,000 and $25,000 so why did the bitches on the bench allow this Travesty of Justice to stand especially when there was evidence of criminal activity in the proceedings by the lawyer in order to advance his case. 

The Editors believe that insiders with the Government of British Columbia blackmailed or threatened the three judges, Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson because that is the only plausible reason the judges would go against the law that clearly favoured Mr. English and his family companies and reject the new evidence that Mr. English had uncovered that proved that lawyer Greg Harney, or someone acting on his behalf, fabricated false evidence that he used to persuade the lower court judge, Master Peter Keighley, to grant a judgment against the English family for $220,000 in what was clearly a corrupt billing practice.



Bitch Liz Bennett

The allegation that Elizabeth Bennett would succumb to blackmail or some other threat is easy to believe because Elizabeth has a clear track record of benefitting criminal insiders with the British Columbia Government and was appointed a judge after a career with the British Columbia Crown prosecution service wheinflater re she is reported to have been part of their crooked pedofile cover up squad of lawyers protecting some of Vancouver's dirtiest sexual perverts and child abusers that included a number of government employees including some judges and prominent lawyers. It is believed that Bennett will profit from the decision because of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family.

Click here to read blog dedicated to exposing corrupt Bitch / Judge Liz Bennett



Bitch Mary Saunders

The allegation against Justice Mary Saunders is also believable because she Campney and Murphy that dissolved after its major client Eron Mortgage was caught in a "massive fraud" where thousands of investors investors lost an estimated $182 million..Saunders was appointed in 1992 by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Justice Minister Kim Campbell both of whom had a reputation for appointing criminals and sleaze bags to the court.  



BITCH  NICOLE GARSON

Harney initially sent Mr. English a $1 million dollar bill for a couple of days of court work and, according to English, pretending to look for alternate financing.  Harney then used threats of legal proceedings if English did not immediately approve the bill which is a form of extortion and a criminal offence in Canada but Mary Liz and Nicole, the bitches on the bench, felt that was just fine which means that other lawyers can rely on this ugly precedent to act in a similar manner.

Knowing that his initial bill was "an act of obvious insanity", Harney then sent a revised bill for $550,000 and commenced a lawsuit to collect the grossly inflated bill.

The initial hearing was before Master Peter Keighley who is suspected to be part of the Freemason criminal gang that operates inside the British Columbia court system.

Keighley first came to the editors attention due to his role in the destruction of British Columbia lawyer Karl Eisbrenner where Keighley presided over a Kangaroo court that relied upon a fraudulent psychiatric report craftily devised by a fraudulent psychiatrist to label Mr. Eisbrenner as delusional and disbar him because Eisbrenner was working on a law case that might have destroyed the career of yet to be elected BC Premier Gordon Campbell. Campbell.

Click here to read more about the case of Karl Eisbrenner.

Keighley should never have presided on the Harney v English case case because he is an employee of the BC Government, he is not a judge, and he had an indirect financial interest in the outcomebecause of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family a fact that did not become apparent to the English family until many months after the hearing but that Keighly knew about from the day he entered the courtroom.

EVIDENCE OF FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE (from the factum)

 

1.        After the hearing before the Registrar and the Chambers Judge, the appellants discovered that the respondents had not delivered and served the Appointment “with the bill attached” upon the appellants as required by the Legal Profession Act and the respondents had improperly entered in the court record the altered backdated bill that was subsequently relied upon by the Registrar without proper delivery or service. 

2.        The admission of the new evidence of the improper use of the altered back dated bill and the failure to comply with the mandatory procedures of the Legal Profession Act with respect to delivery and service of the bill satisfies tests of relevance, reliability and reasonable likelihood of effecting the outcome of the hearings because this evidence goes directly to jurisdiction and raises the a reasonable suspicion of fraud by the respondents that should be addressed and responded to by the Court.

3     The Appointment that commenced the review proceeding before the Registrar under the Legal Profession Act named John English and three corporate entities as respondents, but none of those corporations nor John English were identified as persons charged in the bill that was attached to the Appointment that was used to commence the proceeding contrary to the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court Civil Rules.  

          Statement of Facts, paragraph 17 to 19.

          Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9, s.69. and 70.

          Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 14-1, (21) and (22). 

          Affidavit 6 of English, CA040838, November 19, 2014, para 6, Exhibit” D”. 

          Affidavit 7 of English, CA040838, February 9, 2015, para 2 to 7, Exhibits “D"

 

4.        The bill that was attached to the Appointment had not been previously delivered to the appellants Angleland, Nederland, Paradise Beach Resorts Inc. or John English contrary to s. 69 (1) of the Legal Profession Act.  

 

Legal Profession Act, SBC, 1998, c.9, s. 69 (1).

Interpretation Act RSBC 1996, c. 238, s. 29.

Statement of Facts, para. 17.

5.        The Appointment with the bill attached was not served upon any of the persons charged with the bill as required by section 70 (4) of the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court Civil Rules.

 

Legal Profession Act, SBC, 1998, c.9, s. 70 (4).

Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 14-1, (21) and (22).   

Statement of Facts, para. 19.

6.        The review was carried out by the registrar was on the basis of the altered back dated bill that had never been delivered or served to any of the appellant

Transcript, March13, 2014, p. 23, l.40. to p. 24, l.23.  

Statement of Facts, para. 20 -23.

 

7.        The Registrar did not have jurisdiction to conduct a review of a bill that had not been delivered and served upon the appellants in compliance with Part 8 of the Legal Profession Act.

          Kelly v McMillan, 2003 BCJ, No. 430.     

8.        As a result of the failure of the respondents to comply with the mandatory scheme set out in the Legal Professions Act, the Registrar lacked jurisdiction review the bill, to allow charges and disbursements for any services provided by the respondents to the appellants and to issue the certificates of fees against the appellants.

     Legal Profession Act, SBC [1998], c. 9, Part 8, ss. 64-79

      Kelly v McMillan, 2003 BCJ, No. 430, Goepel, J. 

     Tungohan v Gebara, 2011, BCJ, No. 2145, Registrar Sainty.

 

Click here to read more about How the BC Government Looted the English Family Property

 

Law Society of British Columbia Refuses To Investigate Evidence of Criminal Conduct.

BREAKING NEWS...

The Law Society of British Columbia under the leadership of Tim McGee who has developed a reputation for covering up crime, AGAIN, refused to investigate a complaint by a citizen that a lawyer has engaged in criminal conduct.

This is getting to be a common practice in British Columbia but it is particularly vile because information is emerging that all employees at the Law Society including its executive officers now have their pensions invested with British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the mega company benefitted from the criminal acts of terrorism carried out against the English family and currently holds title to the English family resort near Tofino, British Columbia. 

THIS IS BREAKING NEWS MORE TO COME ...

The Fight to Stop Gregg Harney Continues at the British Columbia Court of Appeal

Korea Watches Canada

Welcome to Our Korean Readers 

 

We wish to welcome and thank our many Korean readers for their ongoing readership over these past few months. We are well aware of how the law firm of Shields Harney allegedly misrepresented a Korean businessman and his family who migrated to Canada, invested his life savings and saw those life savings stolen by crooks criminals and gangsters using the Vancouver courthouse to carry out their crimes. That case cannot be discussed here at this time without permission from the family involved.  

 

All Koreans and other persons thinking of migrating to Canada risk losing all their assets to the gangsters that operate with impunity in Canada's legal system. 

 

We hope that our efforts in publishing this blog and our other legal and judicial blogs will assist to clean out the criminals and gangsters that have infected Canada's court system so that Canada will become a safe place to invest and live in not only for immigrants but for long time Canadian residents also.

If you are reading this in Korea you can help by circulating this information.

Thank you.  고맙습니다

 

Back At The Court of Appeal

 

Back at the Court of Appeal in the nasty case of Gregg Harney against Jack English and his family the decision of the Court of Appeal will likely not be released for a few months. 

Several weeks ago, the Court of Appeal requested additional submissions on the issue of the application of the "clean hands doctrine" to the claim by Shields Harney that they are entitled to a big fee on the basis of the equitable principle of quantum meruit. 

 

In Canada, as in most countries with a British based legal system, there are two systems of law, common law and equity. These two systems were once administered by separate courts but, in Canada and in much of what was once the British Empire, the two court systems were merged in the mid-19th century.

Simply put, equity was devised to provide relief in cases where the old common law was unfair. 

 

In the case of Shields and Harney v. Jack English and his family, Mr. Harney is claiming he is entitled to a fee because he did some work, that work had value and even, if he had no contract with Jack English about how much he would be paid, it would be unfair for Jack English and his family to get the benefit of that value and for him to remain unpaid based on the equitable principle of quantum meruit  which, simply put means, that he should be entitled to a reasonable sum of money to be paid for services rendered or work done when the amount due is not stipulated in a legally enforceable contract.

However, there are rules of equity that apply when one is asking the court for an equitable remedy such as entitlement under the principle of quantum meruit and one of those rules is then he who comes to equity must come with clean hands, hence the phrase, the "clean hands doctrine".  Simply put, this means that the court must not grant an equitable remedy where the conduct of the party seeking the  remedy has been cruel, harsh, unjust, unfair, fraudulent, dishonest or otherwise characterized by moral turpitude.

So, the Court of Appeal requested additional submissions from Mr. English on whether or not the clean hands doctrine would disentitle Mr. Harney and the law firm of Shields Harney to any fee whatsoever.

Mr. English submitted his submissions on February 18, 2016 and Mr. Harney is required to file his reply submission by March 3, 2016.

The decisions of the Court of Appeal is expected a few months after that.

The Editors hope to be able to post the submissions of Jack English and Gregg Harney in the coming weeks.

 

In the Interests of Fairness and Jounalistic Integrity We Publish Greg Harney's Correspondence Complaining About this Blog

Greg Harney

Mr. Harney wrote:

 

Your untruthful defamatory publications continue despite my multiple warnings.

 

Take it down, all of it, or action will be commenced.

 

Greg Harney

 

Shields Harney

602 - 732 Broughton Street

Victoria BC V8W 1E1

 

Our Editor responded:

 

Mr. Harney

 

Thank you for your letter.  

We believe in honesty in reporting and adhere to the highest journalistic standards.

The matter is in the courts and is a matter of public record but, nonetheless, we wish to be fair to you.

Please advise what statements on the blog are, in your opinion, untruthful.

We will review your specific concerns and respond appropriately.

 

You truly,

Joe Adam

Legal judicial blogs

 

Mr. Harney replied

 



John a.k.a. Jack English

No, your reports are not honest or accurate.

No, you do not adhere to the highest journalistic standards, or any standard for that matter.

 

Most of the blog is untruthful, not in my opinion but in fact.

 

The court of appeal case is not English against me, but him appealing the judgments in my favour.

 

I did not “try to rip him off”, and your numbers are all wrong.

 

There is no criminal conspiracy or anyone controlling my claims but me, as he and his companies owe me about $300K at this point.

 

The one page attendance report at St. Paul’s says nothing of any serious medical condition.

 

The court did not force him to attend, but offered the option in advance which he eventually accepted when he attended.

 

The above are not exhaustive, just examples of your patent disregard for the truth or accuracy.

 

If you have any integrity, amend the untruths.

 

Greg Harney

 

Shields Harney

602 - 732 Broughton Street

Victoria BC V8W 1E1

Ph:   250-405-7616

Fax:  250-405-7619

Editors note: We are publishing the above correspondence in the interests of fairness and journalistic integrity. 

Mr. English continues to hold the opinion that Mr. Harney's conduct was highly unprofessional, that he overbilled for work done, that he did not carry out his original retainer and that he tried to bully Mr. English into approving a "draft" bill for $1.1 million.

The Editors also observe that when Mr. Harney sent Mr. English
the official bill it was for a whooping $536,000 including taxes, for a few weeks of work and that Master Keighly of the Supreme Court of British Columbia found the bill to be far too high and reduced that bill by 50 per cent to $256,000 including taxes. 

Mr. Harney kept no time records.  

 

 

Is The BC Government Rigging the Case Against John English At the British Columbia Court of Appeal

Justice Mary Saunders 

 British Columbia Court of Appeal Justice Mary Saunders, shown in photo on right, told a sick and ailing John English that he would not be permitted to use a qualified lawyer to present his case against BC lawyer Greg Harney who Mr. English alleges tried to rip him off with a million dollar bill for a few days in court. 

(Editor's Note: In fairness to Mr. Harney, the $1.1 million dollar bill sent to Mr. English was a "draft" of a proposed bill and, eventually, Mr. Harney reduced his bill to about $550,000 which the court then reduced to about $220,000. Mr. Harney kept no time records.)   

In the Editors opinion, the highly unusual ruling suggests that the British Columbia Court of Appeal continued to be threatened or blackmailed by the criminal gang inside the Government of British Columbia that is manipulating the Harney case as a tool to complete the looting of the English family resort property near Tofino, B.C.

Click here to view the firebomb attacks on the English family resort and more. 

Elizabeth Bennett

John English has been under doctors care for a serious concussion sustained last fall and he has been advised not to appear in court until his health is better so, his long time family friend and fully qualified lawyer, John Frederick Carten, approached the court  and asked to present the legal arguments because Mr. English was not well. 

Mr. Carten also tendered to the court proof of Mr. English's serious medical condition that was verified by a written report from Dr. Susan O'Donnell of St. Paul's Hospital who had examined Mr. English as a result of a medical crisis earlier in the morning. 

Mr. Carten is a highly qualified lawyer who has appeared at all levels of court in Canada and he sometimes assists self represented litigants who cannot otherwise afford a lawyer

Click here to read more about Mr. Carten's work in Canada's justice system. 

Objections were also raised about the presence of Justice Elizabeth Bennett on the case because she is a former career civil servant in British Columbia whose pension plan is probably managed by the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that was the beneficiary of the looting of the English family property by terrorist tactics. 

Ms. Bennett has developed a reputation for being selected to preside on cases involving bureaucrats and politicians who are alleged to have committed crimes while in office in British Columbia.  She was recently assigned to a case involving Mr. Carten where she made a highly questionable ruling and her assignment, in that case, is evidence of improper interference with the judiciary by the BC Government and corroborates Mr. English`s suspicion that the BC Government is manipulating the Court of Appeal against him. 

Ms. Bennett was involved in both the cover up of the alleged crimes of Premier Glen Clark and the cover up of the alleged crimes under the leadership of Premier Gordon Campbell. 

Based on her body language and demeanour in court on May 28, 2015, it is apparent that Ms. Bennett is under great stress that is consistent with criminal blackmail or other forms of threat or inducement.  

The court left Mr. English with no practical option but to risk his health and make a brief attendance to insure his appeal was not defeated by default. 

The other judge on the case is Justice Nicole Garson (shown in photo on left) who, like Saunders, Bennett and Chief Justice Bauman owes her position as a high paid Canadian judge (salary $250,000 plus per annum) to the corrupt regime of gangsters who worked for Prime Minister Jean Chretien - a regime that was widely known for corruption, judicial case fixing, and other crimes. According to the Court of Appeal Web Site, Garson (shown in photo on right) was appointed a supreme court judge on March 21, 2001 and a Court of Appeal Judge on May 14, 2009.    

A close examination of Garson's complexion in the recent photo on the left shows the tell tale signs of the Irish Curse, red coloured blotchy patches that form with the making of dishonest decisions, that killed former Canadian finance minister Jim Flaherty and that afflicts Elizabeth Bennett and Chief Justice Bauman.

The investigation of all four Justices, Bauman, Saunders Bennett

BC Government Take Over Tactics 

 and Garson continues and complaints have been filed about all of them for their obviously corrupt conduct in the English family case that involves heinous acts of terrorism by government agents against the English family that includes the deliberate burning of their family home (shown in photo on right).